Ccm Advocates for Separation of Religion From Politics: Is That Feasible?

Print or Email This Article

The advocacy by Tanzania’s ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) politicians for separating religion from politics represents a significant ideological shift. Still, its feasibility is constrained by deep-rooted constitutional, societal, and institutional complexities. Below is a structured analysis:

1. Constitutional and Legal Frameworks.

   – Entrenched Religious Accommodations:

 Tanzania’s union constitution guarantees religious freedom but allows limitations for “national interest,” “morality,” or “public health” . Zanzibar’s semi-autonomous constitution explicitly incorporates Islamic principles, maintaining Sharia-based *qadi* courts for family matters . This dual system legally embeds religion in governance.

   – Blasphemy and Registration Laws:

 The penal code criminalizes religious insult (“wounding religious feelings”), with penalties up to one year imprisonment. Religious groups must register with state-approved bodies (e.g., mainland Muslim groups require approval from BAKWATA, a state-influenced council) . These mechanisms blur state-religion boundaries.

🤝 2. Political Traditions and Practices.

   – Religious Balancing in Leadership:

Since independence, Tanzania has maintained an unwritten rule of alternating Christian and Muslim presidents, with prime ministers from the other faith . President Samia Suluhu Hassan (Muslim) broke tradition by retaining a Muslim prime minister, highlighting the system’s flexibility but not its abolition.

   – Instrumentalization of Religion:

Politicians historically exploit religious divisions. For example, opposition parties like CHADEMA were labeled “Roman Catholic-sponsored,” while CUF was smeared as “Islamic fundamentalists“. Such tactics reinforce religion’s political utility.

🏛️ 3. Institutional Barriers.

   – Qadi Courts in Zanzibar:

These Sharia courts handle family law, appealing to a panel including the Chief Justice and Islamic scholars . Their integration into the state judiciary makes full separation impractical without constitutional upheaval.

   – Education and Public Services:

 Public schools permit optional religious classes and mandate religious affiliation on registration forms. Medical forms require religious identification to accommodate customs. These practices institutionalize religion in state functions.

 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 4. Sociocultural Realities.

   – High Religiosity:

Over 99% of Zanzibar’s population is Muslim, while the mainland is 63% Christian and 34% Muslim. Traditional African religions also influence daily life. This religiosity permeates social norms, making religion a natural vector for political mobilization.

   – Interfaith Tensions:

 Incidents like the 2023 mob attacks on alleged “witches” in Kigoma and the suspension of churches supporting LGBTQ+ rights illustrate how state interventions intersect with religious morality.

 ⚡ 5. CCM’s Strategic Position.

   – Constitutional Reform Agenda:

CCM’s 2025 manifesto proposes constitutional revisions, potentially addressing governance flaws. However, it avoids explicit secularization, focusing instead on “national unity”. Analysts like Dr. Onesmo Kyauke view this as a tactic to co-opt opposition demands without systemic change.

   – Internal Party Dynamics:

CCM relies on mass organizations (e.g., the Muslim-led Parents Association) for grassroots support . Disentangling these groups from religious identity could weaken its outreach.

🔮 6. Feasibility Assessment.

   – Partial Secularization Possible:

Limited reforms, like reducing blasphemy prosecutions or streamlining religious registrations, are feasible. President Samia’s media liberalization and opposition dialogues show incremental openness.

   – Full Separation Unlikely:

Structural barriers—Zanzibar’s autonomy, Sharia courts, and constitutional clauses—prevent a French-style *laïcité*. Moreover, Tanzania’s “accommodationist” model aligns more with India than with strict secular states . As scholar Dr. Richard Mbunda warns, without actionable steps, CCM’s rhetoric risks being “electoral placation”.

💎 Key Takeaways.

While CCM’s advocacy signals recognition of religion-politics tensions, full separation is implausible under current frameworks. Achievable steps include harmonizing registration laws and depoliticizing religious appointments, but constitutional entrenchment and societal religiosity ensure religion remains a governance pillar. The path forward requires nuanced reform—not outright divorce—between religion and state.

Can religion be separated from politics?

The relationship between religion and politics is interpreted differently within Islam and Christianity, shaped by theological foundations, historical developments, and contemporary practices. Below is a comparative analysis:

 🕌 Islamic Perspective on Religion and Politics.

1. Theological Integration.

   – Islam emerged as both a religious and political system under Prophet Muhammad, establishing the first Islamic state in Medina. Unlike Christianity, Islamic scripture (Quran and Sunnah) provides guidelines for governance, law (sharia), and social order.

   – Sharia as State Law:

 Majorities in South Asia (84%), sub-Saharan Africa (64%), and the Middle East (74%) support making sharia official law, though application varies. Criminal punishments (hudud) are favored in South Asia (81%), but less so in Central Asia (38%).

   – Religious Leaders in Politics:

 Most Muslims in Southeast Asia (75–82%) and the Middle East (55–80%) endorse religious leaders influencing politics, contrasting with Central Asia and Europe (<40%).

2. Modern Political Dynamics.

   – Islamist Movements:

Parties like Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood and Tunisia’s Ennahda pursued electoral power post-2011 Arab Spring but faced repression, leading to a decline in party-based “political Islam“.

   – Alternative Influence:

 Religion now shapes politics through: 

     – State institutions (e.g., Egypt’s Al-Azhar overseeing education).

     – Personal status laws (e.g., debates on divorce in Egypt).

     – Transnational jihadism and sectarianism (e.g., Sunni-Shia conflicts).

   – Public Opinion:

In Libya, 87% want Islam to guide public life but distrust religious parties as “manipulative,” preferring moderate Islamic governance.

3. Key Debates.

   – Sharia’s Scope:

Whether it should apply exclusively to Muslims (majority view) or all citizens (e.g., 55% in Egypt). 

   – Democracy Compatibility:

57% in Tanzania and 67% in Malaysia prefer democracy, yet link it to Islamic moral frameworks.

– ✝️ Christian Perspective on Religion and Politics.

1. Theological Separation.

   – Jesus’ distinction between God and Caesar (Matthew 22:21) underpins Christian support for church-state separation. Only 13% of Americans advocate declaring Christianity the national religion, though 44% support promoting Christian values.

   – Limited Government Role:

 Government is seen as a tool for temporal justice (Romans 13:1–7), not spiritual salvation. Politics cannot address humanity’s core problem: sin.

2. Modern Engagement Principles. 

   – Individual vs. Institutional Roles:

Churches should avoid partisan politics, focusing on preaching and sacraments. Individual Christians, however, are urged to engage as “ambassadors” of biblical values.

   – Guiding Frameworks: 

     – Prioritize “Kingdom over Nation” (Philippians 3:20). 

     – Advocate for justice (e.g., opposing abortion) while rejecting political idolatry.

     – Emphasize integrity and prayer in civic participation.

   – Biblical Influence:

 49% of Americans say the Bible should shape U.S. laws, but 51% oppose this. White evangelicals are most supportive (86%).

3. Key Tensions.

   – Christian Nationalism:

Only 5% of Americans view it favorably; 25% reject it. Critics warn against conflating gospel messaging with political power.

   – Moral Witness vs. Compromise:

Some churches prioritize social agendas (e.g., abortion bans), risking doctrinal dilution. Revivalists argue for focus on spiritual renewal.

↔️ Comparative Analysis.

 💎 Notable Observations.

Islam traditionally envisions religion and politics as integrated, with sharia providing comprehensive societal guidance, though modern applications range from electoral politics to cultural influence. Christianity, rooted in a distinction between spiritual and temporal authority, encourages civic engagement but warns against politicizing faith, prioritizing gospel witness over state power.

 Both faiths face tensions between ideal frameworks and diverse contemporary practices, reflecting broader struggles to navigate pluralism and secularization.